(Credits: Uccellinodidelpiero.com , Antonio Travel )
This exam is in my opinion, more than many other "technical" and difficult, one of the examples held up to now (and therefore to read and spread) because it shows fully il vittimismo inopportuno e la vaghezza delle accuse interiste e l’attivismo di Giacinto Facchetti (che avrebbe detto a Moratti “Questo non puoi chiedermelo”, ma che disse “Io non ho la pazienza del dott. Moratti, vedete che questa storia finirà male”) e Massimo Moratti. Un testimone, Fabio Monti (Corriere della Sera, interista), che riferisce “chiacchiere”, per usare un termine caro all’avv. Prioreschi, e che lascia esterefatti soprattutto perchè a chiedere che fosse ascoltato in aula era stata proprio la Procura, avendo giudicato “rilevante” quanto dal giornalista affermato in un interrogatorio svoltosi nel maggio 2010 (nonostante le indagini fossero state dichiarate closed in April 2007). "If these are the news!", One might exclaim ... Let's investigate further. Because of the absence of Gianfelice Facchetti and Danilo Nucini it fell at the first sign of the sport telling Corriere della Sera that, thanks to his "relationship of trust" (cited above), the late Giacinto Facchetti's still alive when told about the "M system." The hearing is on March 1, 2011.
SYSTEM M. - Asked by PM Campbell, the journalist describes what the then president of Inter had told him, "Facchetti had mentioned the possibility that an arbitrator (Danilo Nucini ed) talked a bit 'of this situation, which he judged "abnormal." It was really waiting to see if this referee was going to spill the beans so made. He believed that there were anomalies in this system also heavy in the type of conduct is to be descriptions of the decisions that were made in the field and off the field. In general, he spoke of a tendency to violate those which were the "general rules", and this has also said in interviews .. He was convinced that there was essentially what was then called a "Moggi system" and that there was even apart from Juventus, whose strength he never doubted. This system applied in particular to relations with the world of arbitration, but in general just trying to break these "rules". This was his idea, in short. " A story, his, the proceedings (a lot) of little importance, since not been confirmed by Facchetti, and since it is based, even if, on feelings and beliefs, which are worth little or nothing ("talk" to define the lawyer. Prioreschi) .
I strictly on Ronaldo - then asked if Campbell had been reported in Monti 's "beginning" of this system, to try to sort: "First there was the championship that had 97/98 followed the left .. (We are the now mythological Ronaldo-Iuliano, ed), then I think his stories that he had identified as the watershed in 2002 (the Scudetto on May 5, ed) for everything that had happened at the end of the season, in recent games For example, the home fixture against Chievo, De Santis arbitrated by a penalty not given to Ronaldo. Beyond specific episode, there was the belief by Facchetti - the belief that there was no proven evidence - that there was a system that did not guarantee the correctness of the championship. " Still "talk", not supported by any evidence. The prosecutor then asked if had ever spoken Facchetti di Mariano Fabiani, allora dirigente del Messina e presunto “braccio destro” di Luciano Moggi. «Siccome lui era convinto che questo sistema prescindesse anche dalla Juventus, società specifica, era molto attento anche per esempio a quello che succedeva nei confronti della società del Messina che era una società – secondo lui – in questo tipo di orbita. E quindi parlò insistentemente di Fabiani». In che termini non è dato sapere. Qui siamo ai “si dice che”. Interesse processuale ignoto.
ANCHE PELLEGRINO CUPOLARO – Si passa agli arbitri. «Si insomma lui era convinto sostanzialmente che la figura centrale fosse quella di De Santis e poi che ce ne fossero anche altri: per esempio, lui era molto concentrato sull’arbitro Pellegrino (non imputato, ndr), tanto è vero che in occasione di un Inter-Juventus di 7 anni fa perché era la fine di febbraio (in realtà era l’inizio. Coppa Italia, 12 febbraio 2004, ndr), dopo che c’era stata questa partita che era finita ai supplementari e poi ai rigori con la vittoria della Juve, siccome lui era diventato presidente da appena un mese, aveva detto “Io non ho la pazienza del dott. Moratti, vedrete che qui questa storia finirà male”». Fermiamoci per fare chiarezza. La partita, che per la sola cronaca è del 12 febbraio 2004 (e non della fine), è un Inter-Juventus semifinale di ritorno di Coppa Italia. L’arbitro Pellegrino, as reported in the chronicles of the time, "within two minutes Cordoba expelled for a hard foul on Nedved and deny entry to a penalty for Inter Montero on Emre ( cit. Journal). You might also like to clarify stay in reality there was no penalty on Emre ("the alleged penalty claimed by Inter seems to be no" cit. Journal), and as such the goal of the Inter 2-2 that sent the teams to extra time was the 95th (and a referee blows his whistle in bad faith before ..) but this is not the point. The point is that, if in 141 games in a direct or wrong in particular (who does the victim against the system), you risk being labeled for life and suffer a harsh media pillory and insults. In this regard, I invite you to read an article (cited . Corriere ) just signed Fabio Monti, model Boffo " rather indicative, and remember how Facchetti was referred for insulting the referee heavily back in the locker room. These were the words spoken at the press conference: "I think there are institutions that must control these things. Right now they are fugitives. Moratti has so far been very self control, but I do not have as much patience. " Pronounced at the end of last season that the subject of Calciopoli (to you every reflection).
Racalbuto E GLI ALTRI – Proseguiamo con l’esame. Il Pm Capuano legge le dichiarazioni rese nell’interrogatorio del 3 maggio 2010 nel quale Monti aveva riferito di aver sentito da Facchetti come della Cupola facessero parte oltre a De Santis anche gli arbitri Gabriele, Palanca, Bertini “anche se in parte”, Racalbuto, Trefoloni e Pellegrino. Monti conferma. Occhio a questo passaggio, perchè si rivelerà importante. Capuano domanda: «Le parlò anche di Nucini, tra questi arbitri?». La risposta: «Nono di Nucini non aveva parlato in particolare. Mi pare che su Nucini avesse un’idea un pò… così… non riusciva a decifrare bene il personaggio, insomma!». Ci torneremo. Intanto continue with the referees. On Racalbuto: "He was very accommodating on Racalbuto beginning and I would say it frowned and tended to try to interpret some of his mistakes. Then, instead it seems to me at a game with Chievo , which was in March of 2003 (February, in reality, ed), I think that totally changed my mind. It happened that there was an expulsion of Okan (yes, because that whole side including owner Gamarra, Okan Buruk, Recoba, Batistuta and the bench had Dalmat, Morpheus, and Guglialminpietro Kallon, with coach Cuper ... mica Buffon, Nedved, Camoranesi, Trezeguet, Zambrotta, Thuram, Davids, Di Vaio ... ed), a penalty for Chievo for a hands not clear, but above all an attitude that the arbitrator had held then with the Inter players in the field. " We will come back here, because it will be the same mountains to exonerate the arbitrator, including the joy of his lawyer.
THE BO $ $ DE SANTIS - We arrive, finally, the most embarrassing moment of the entire examination, when, after a series of speeches to bar "made without any proof door, he goes to speak to De Santis. Capuano always reads a statement in the interrogation of May 2010 in which Monti said: "The referee De Santis, it is true that in our environment, journalism was a change of cultured attitude of the referee in the course of the season 2004/05. In particular, during the meeting Parma-Juve, I can not remember the source of the news, but I remember very well that in our environment was reported that De Santis Juventus in the locker room, speaking directly with the Juventus players, pronounced more or less exactly this sentence: "No, do not count more about me!". " Monti confirmation, and all hell broke loose. "Confirming the rumors? The talk ...! "Pursues the lawyer. Prioreschi. "To everything there is a limit in the chair. Let's take a serious process repeats ..!», represented. Morescanti. "President I have no further questions," Campbell contends the prosecutor. Starts in this climate-examination of the defense lawyers are ready to start the cross-fire and crumble because no sources or evidence, that until then, unacceptable. Let me hear an audio clip that fits right now and the next request for an explanation of the two lawyers, because certain passages can not be described: to be "lived".
As you may have heard, the response of Monti, who admits to not having sources and reporting only stories without evidence, the defendant no longer sees Paolo Bergamo and begins to scream "It's not something serious!" being removed from the classroom. Here let a small personal observation: maximum solidarity. Do not forget that you choose the life of these people ..
Hen $ HOW - The continuing cross-examined and, having spoken Monti De Santis, the lawyer involved. Gallinelli in his defense. The intent of the lawyer is known: try to show how De Santis was wrongfully hounded ($$$), and at the same time to end the "nonsense" of Parma-Juventus (a game already being our dossier, which I invite you to read). "Listen, Facchetti said if he was summoned to and if he appeared before the Milan prosecutor's office to report these facts?". No. "He said if he made the investigations personal? ". Not even. "So the environment that you own the first page of the report to which we refer said:" But then Facchetti himself was now engaged in a personal investigation of his work. " Can you explain to the court what is it? ". Monti's response: "What he was trying to figure out what was really happening ...." Gallinelli urges him to get points for ($$$): 'Who and where! He was making a personal investigation? ". Monti is on the corner: "I do not know if it made of ... that is what we mean by personal investigations ... of course he was looking for ...." He takes large, and Gallinelli presses again: "Here we are before the court, not only in the prosecutors! Where they made these findings? In playgrounds? In the federal structure ...? A Coverciano ...? (Or ...?). "He was trying to understand the various elements that I can not understand why he has not called me what was happening." Gallinelli still feel your breath, "Look, but she was a journalist, did not ask for more detailed information on Facchetti on these findings ...?". "I asked, yes, but things were even before the eyes of all ...." At that riagitano minds. We put an audio clip with the second show examination.
"Bravo, bravo .. He was going to spy, in fact, "says the Morescanti. Both the "his" Fabiani, both De Santis. Gallinelli already anticipate the money. For the rest comes to us right away, Casoria, we are the sporting grounds, the bar talk. And he asks the witness if it were entirely (note: Monti test well to deny ..). Hen, finally, closes the first chapter interceptions asking if Monti was aware of the situations Facchetti ("I think so), then if he knew of a complaint formally presented to the Prosecutor of Milan by Moratti or Facchetti (yes," by Court "), then if he knew if he was heard by Dr Nucini Boccassini (yes). A triumph. That allows him to ease to close the file "arbitration". Before you confirm Nucini made four times as the fourth man's importance, then as a referee a match against Udinese where expelled Di Biagio, Monti then asks if he had never done this to Facchetti, given their relationships extra -arbitration, if it was not inappropriate for Nucini refereed the Nerazzurri. "No, I told him (in the face of the lessons of morality!). After booty full, the latest specification concerns the practice Parma Gallinelli remember how it really is the fourth man to go down in the locker room to make the appeal of the players (and how could he have spoken De Santis in front of the Juventus team?).
Prioreschi-examination - The last but one to operate (there is "meat" in all) is represented. Prioreschi. Proceed to dispute. After listening to all the examination and Facchetti-examination of his colleagues did not know how good to fit the role of Nucini and had not yet understood, the law Prioreschi continuous sentence previously read by the prosecutor, which set the arbiters of the "Cupola ". Incredibly, it continued. "Even Danilo Nucini was part of this group, but with a very special role as mostly Nucini refereed almost always in Serie B and only a few circumstances matches in Serie A. In other words it was as if Nucini not be used as a referee with the same continuity than others, but especially at certain times deemed most appropriate for this group since the arbitrator Bergamo career was not so bright as that of others " . The question: "So Nucini Facchetti said she was part of the dome?". Monti: "I confirm everything that was said there." In short, suddenly the lights become certainties and doubts (and the situation, already complicated than his, is complicated: Tuesday 15 it will be fun ..). At this point, the Casoria want to understand something more. Asked what he meant "Bertini at least in part:" Why is partly yes and partly no?. Monti: "Why do Facchetti was a thing not be completed (in acquittals for all, including Bertini, ed). "In what terms,", claiming the poor Casoria. I bring you again to lighten the article, a clip that "will" exchange of words with gaffes Mountains.
"You can go," says Casoria. In reality there is room for a final clarification. As previously announced, the lawyer involved. of Racalbuto, to sweep away any doubts about that match with Chievo (in which, for the record, he was expelled, the 92 °, even a player of Chievo, Corini). The application is dry, "You talking to Facchetti, says - about the Chievo-Inter game -" some players (of the editor's note) have insulted Mr. Racalbuto challenge this sketch and did not adopt any measures against them. " We can say that Mr. Salvatore Racalbuto done so according to the reconstruction would therefore benefited the Inter players warning them not to expel or refuse to grant? ". After a short negotiation ("after the penalty," was inadequate ") grants Monti" In the second part we say that it is. " And save even Racalbuto. In full .
0 comments:
Post a Comment